Theme Four
Taxation and Redistribution
Pre-fiscal inequality in LAC is among the highest in the world. However, existing analyses suggest that while fiscal policy reduces inequality, this reduction is small relative to the potential in LAC. In some countries, fiscal policy is poverty-increasing.
On the revenue side, a system that is heavily tilted towards consumption taxes and with limited progressivity in income taxes does not redistribute much either. Pension systems in LAC are often regressive. Workers who transit between the formal and informal sectors during their careers do not make sufficient contributions to obtain the right to a contributory pension, while paying payroll taxes that are effectively subsidizing the upper middle class and the rich.
The fourth theme explores the limited role that fiscal redistribution plays in the region to level the playing field. It addresses issues of equity and efficiency on both the revenue and expenditure sides of the government’s balance sheet.
How considerable is the redistributive power of tax systems in Latin America?
Gain insights about the region’s fiscal dynamics and its implications for development in our working papers by clicking on the links below:
Fiscal Policy, Income Redistribution, and Poverty Reduction in Latin America
Health systems and health inequalities in Latin America
Calculating the redistributive impact of pension systems in LAC
Cash transfers, poverty, and inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean
Preferences for redistribution in Latin America
Some key findings:
- While LAC fiscal systems consistently reduce income inequality, they do not necessarily reduce poverty. In fact, in nine out of the 18 LAC countries, fiscal policies increase poverty, primarily due to consumption taxes on basic goods (Lustig et al., 2023).
- In most countries of the region, formal workers are covered by a well-funded contributory scheme with a distinct network of healthcare providers, while informal workers rely on a non-contributory scheme, leading to a segmentation of health coverage based on labor market status (Bancalari et al., 2023).
- The actual incidence of pension systems is far less progressive than their design implies. Given the levels and patterns of informal work in LAC, a much higher share of high-income workers is eligible for pension benefits. This means that the incidence of built-in subsidies is highly concentrated in the upper part of the income distribution (Altamirano et al., 2023).
- Non-contributory cash transfer programs reduce the poverty rate by 1.9 percentage points, the poverty gap by 2.0 pp, and the Gini coefficient by 0.7 pp. The largest changes are recorded in Argentina, Suriname and Panama (Stampini et al., 2023).
- The social contract in Latin America is fractured: the perception of government and elite corruption is rampant, and there is a strong sense of mistrust among citizens. This hampers support for social programs that help the most vulnerable (Busso et al., 2023).
Panel Members
Orazio Attanasio
Yale University
Richard Blundell
University College London and Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS)
Santiago Levy
Brookings Institution
Facundo Alvaredo
Paris School of Economics and École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales
Nora Lustig
Tulane University
Ana De La O Torres
Yale University